742 F. Supp. 2d 40 - Adair v. Solis’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
18 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 705 · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7513 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Withrow v. Larkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.' " Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. , 475 U.S. 574 , 586-87, 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) ). Moreover, "although summary judgment must be approached with special caution in discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not relieved of his obligation to support his allegations by affidavits or other competent evidence showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.