Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 N.E.2d 463 - Stephenson v. State

Stephenson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
5
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[AJpplication of this rule is rare and ... the standard to be applied is whether the testimony is so incredibly dubious or inherently improbable that no person could believe it.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a court will impinge on the jury's responsibility to judge the credibility of the witness only when it is confronted with inherently improbable testimony or coerced, equivocal, wholly uncorroborated testimony of incredible dubiosity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Flavorable evidence is material, and constitutional error results from its suppression by the government, 'if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.