Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 P.2d 35 - Henry v. Smith

Henry v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on AMF Tubescope Company v. Hatchel · Special Indemnity Fund v. Stockton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment” adopted and published by the American Medical Association which were in effect when the examination was made. (j) The report itself must be signed by the physician and he verified or contain a written declaration, made under the penalty of perjury, that the report is true. The following form of declaration is suggested: “I declare under penalty of perjury that I have examined this report and all statements contained herein, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct and complete.” . American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, p. 57, Table 53 (2nd Ed.1984): Impairment Due to Other Disorders of the Spine, provides in pertinent part: "B. Intervertebral Disc Lesions ...2. Operated, disc removed without residuals 5%”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.