¶1We affirm the denial of appellant’s successive motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking to vacate his sentence as illegal. Consistent with Rivera v. State, 728 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1998), and Prince v. State, 719 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, No. 94,526, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1999), we hereby prohibit appellant from any future filings concerning issues that were or should have been raised in prior postconviction proceedings. We also caution appellant that if he violates this prohibition, he will face additional sanctions.
742 So. 2d 323
Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 7, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-07
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2000
2 state decisions
Relies on 732 So. 2d 323 - DiPietro v. Griefer · 728 So. 2d 1165 - Rivera v. State · Prince v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-07-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →