Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

742 So. 2d 349

State v. Damico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-08-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on 740 So. 2d 20 - Woods v. State · Raimondo v. American United Life Insurance · 727 So. 2d 314 - McKnight v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-08-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the sentence imposed. See State v. Cotton, 728 So.2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)(holding that the trial court has discretion to determine whether a defendant should be sentenced as a Prison Re-*350leasee Reoffender under the Prison Re-leasee Reoffender Act). See also Coleman v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1324, 739 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Cowart, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1085, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 245876 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr.28, 1999); State v. Wise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D657, 740 So.2d 20, 1999 WL 123568 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar.10, 1999). We acknowledge and certify conflict with Woods v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

¶2Affirmed; conflict certified.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
/742/so2d/349 · .json · Public domain