Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State · 257 So. 2d 21 - Franklin v. State · King v. State · 627 So. 2d 1279 - Williams v. State · 561 So. 2d 384 - Mohammed v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order for a prosecutor's comments to be deemed prejudicial, they must `vitiate the trial or so poison the minds of the jurors that [the defendant] did not receive a fair trial.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“union with the vagina of the minor victim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.