Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 SW2D 810 - Milam v. State

Milam v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Helms v. State · Galitz v. State · Carter v. State · Millican v. State · Shaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appeal is perfected in a criminal case by giving timely notice of appeal; ... if the judgment was rendered upon his plea of guilty ... and the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and his attorney, in order to prosecute an appeal for a nonjurisdictional defect or error that occurred prior to entry of the plea the notice shall state that the trial court granted permission to appeal or shall specify that those matters were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.