Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 SW2D 831 - Mills v. State

Mills v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2017

6 state decisions

401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 296th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Agurs · Ahumada v. United States · Quinones v. State · Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen two or more courts have concurrent jurisdiction of any criminal offense, the court in which an indictment or a complaint shall first be filed shall retain jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant who does not interpose a plea to the jurisdiction may waive the right to question jurisdiction under article 4.16.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.