Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 F.2d 1365 - National Center for Immigrants Rights, Inc. v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

National Center for Immigrants Rights, Inc. v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

743 F.2d 1365 · 1984

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2020
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2020 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc. (1991), Berger v. Heckler (1985)

32 federal appellate · 4 district ·

29019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1329 (§ 279 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Brown v. General Services Administration · University of Texas v. Camenisch · Toilet Goods Association v. Wga Rdner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the greater the relative hardship to the moving party, the less probability of success must be shown.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “upon a conclusive showing in habeas corpus proceedings that the Attorney General is not proceeding with such reasonable dispatch as may be warranted by the particular facts and circumstances in the case of any alien to determine deportability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “deals only with complaints about delays in determining deportability in individual cases,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.