Agha v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
743 F.3d 609 · 2014
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on McCarthy v. Madigan · Sims v. Apfel · Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Faddoul v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be 'inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lesum v. Barr · Martin v. Barr“[t]o qualify for relief under the CAT, [Lesum] must show it is more likely than not that he ... would be tortured if returned to [Bangladesh].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lesum v. Barr“Where, as here, the BIA has adopted the Immigration Court's opinion and added reasoning and analysis of its own, we review both decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lesum v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.