AuBuchon v. Geithner’s Empirical Analysis
743 F.3d 638 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox · Livadas v. Bradshaw · Manning v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“failure to promote can constitute an adverse employment action that would support a plaintiff's retaliation claim[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To avoid the triviality pitfall, the retaliation must produce some 'injury or harm.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.