743 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Hamilton v. Geithner’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 20 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies under Title VII does not implicate a court’s subject-matter jurisdiction and, thus, dismissal pursuant to Federad Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) would be inappropriate”); see also Artis v. Bernanke, 630 F.3d 1031 , 1034 n. 4 (D.C.Cir. 2011) (noting that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.