Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 N.E.2d 331 - Kopkey v. State

Kopkey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rochin v. People of California · Illinois v. Wardlow · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Griffin v. Wisconsin · Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n-home detention, like probation or incarceration, is a form of criminal punishment. Like probation, in-home detention is one point “on a continuum of possible punishments ranging from solitary confinement in a maximum-security facility to a few hours of mandatory community service.” In-home detention is likewise a conditional liberty dependent on the observance of-special restrictions that are meant to assure that the detention serves as a period of genuine rehabilitation and that the community is not harmed by the detainee’s having frequent contact with the public. These same goals require and justify the exercise of supervision to assure that the restrictions are in fact observed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to believe Schlechty engaged in criminal activity thereby supporting the warrantless search. Reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause and requires a showing considerably less than preponderance of the evidence, but it still requires at least a minimal level of objective justification and more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “and violated Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause). But here, we disagree there was anything unreasonable about the search of Schlechty's car. It was apparently used or attempted to be used as an instrument to lure a young girl. And at the time of the search, Schlechty was not present in the car. Thus our inquiry focuses on the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.