Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 N.E.2d 370 - Eichenberger v. Eichenberger

Eichenberger v. Eichenberger’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Sullivan v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. · Tofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc. · Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD Bank · 171 Ind. App. 610 - In the Matter of Estate of Bannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a final judgment on the merits has been rendered which acts as a complete bar to a subsequent action on the same issue or claim between those parties and their privies”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “plaintiff seeks to foreclose the defendant from litigating an issue the defendant had previously litigated unsuccessfully in an action with another party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A claim is frivolous when it is taken primarily for the purpose of harassment, if the attorney is unable to make a good faith and rational argument on the merits of the action, or if the lawyer is unable to support the action taken by a good faith and rational argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. In determining whether a claim' is unreasonable, this court looks to the totality of the cireumstances, including the law and facts ascertainable at the time of filing. If after this inquiry the court finds no reasonable attorney would consider the claim worthy of litigation, the claim is unreasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.