Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 N.E.2d 719 - Lambert v. State

Lambert v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Grinstead v. State (2006), Randy L. Knapp v. State of Indiana (2014)

4 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

270200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Bagley · Liteky et al United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on the trial counsel's failure to make an objection, the [petitioner] must show that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. McCorker v. State · Parish v. State
  2. “'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Pruitt v. State · Owens v. State
  3. “a bias is `personal' if it stems from an extrajudicial source—meaning a source separate from the evidence and argument presented at the proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Pruitt v. State · Bahm v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.