Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 P.2d 658 - Boyd v. State

Boyd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2023

8 state decisions

3019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California · Thompson v. State · Hall v. State · Campbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]eliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony for both pre and post- Stovall confrontations. The factors to be considered are set out in Biggers. These include the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness' degree of attention, the accuracy of his prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated at the confrontation, and the time between the crime and the confrontation. Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Phillips v. State
  2. “Any matter is a proper subject of cross-examination which is responsive to testimony given on direct examination and which tends to elucidate, modify, explain, contradict, or rebut testimony given in chief by the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 2023 OK CR 1 - PEREZ v. STATE

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.