Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

743 So. 2d 1200

Davis v. Heye

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 5, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-11-05

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2018

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“We dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari because no order was rendered from which certiorari can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 250 So. 3d 206 - Holt v. Keetley

Relies on State v. Siegel · 643 So. 2d 106 - Gregg v. State · In Re Guardianship of AP

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-11-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We dismiss the petition for writ of cer-tiorari because no order was rendered from which certiorari can be taken and vest jurisdiction in this court. The circuit court only pronounced an oral ruling. See State v. Siegel, 662 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also In re Guardianship of A.P., 644 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gregg v. State, 643 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.
/743/so2d/1200 · .json · Public domain