McCaleb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 524 So. 2d 313 - Cabello v. State · 593 So. 2d 20 - Littlejohn v. State · 482 So. 2d 1102 - Clemons v. State · 624 So. 2d 500 - Sykes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]rejudice is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel `actively represented conflicting interests' and that `an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we have the discretion to address the substance of what appears to be a petitioner's complaint even if inartfully phrased.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Separate acts, though committed close in point of time to one another, may constitute separate criminal offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beall v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.