743 So. 2d 749 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dorthey · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · 676 So. 2d 1108 - State v. Bradford · 643 So. 2d 1289 - State v. Kershaw · 407 So. 2d 685 - State v. Bruins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he penalty increase is computed by reference to the sentencing provisions of the underlying offense. Similarly, the conditions imposed on the sentence are those called for in the reference statute.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris · State v. Fletcher“benefit of probation or suspension of sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.