McDaniel v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Haase
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court’s opinion ... does not reflect any 'new facts and changed conditions which were not determined and could not be anticipated’ in our original opinion.”). 18 . Act of June 30, 2002, ch. 859, 2002 Tenn. Pub. Acts 2340 . 19 . Act of May 6, 2004, ch. 759, 2004 Tenn. Pub. Acts 1737 . 20 . The 2004 legislation did not otherwise alter Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-6-101(a)(2)(B). 21 . That the intent of the legislation was to relax the common-law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.