Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 743 SW2D 199 - State v. Thien Duc Le

State v. Thien Duc Le’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Cabbage · State v. Hatchett · Braziel v. State · 21 Ala. App. 100 - Terry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the duty of the court to provide the necessary means for the defendant to understand the nature of the charges against him, the testimony of the witnesses, and to communicate to the court. Failure to do so would be a violation of one’s constitutional right to be heard, to know the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted by the witnesses. (Citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.