Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

744 F.2d 10

Docket No. 29, Docket 84-6097.

Beesmer v. Heckler

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 6, 1984.

Decided Sept. 11, 1984.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1984-09-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1984

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1984-09-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John S. Hogg, Hamilton, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Edward R. Broton, Asst. U.S. Atty., N.D. N.Y., Syracuse, N.Y., (Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., U.S. Atty., Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4*11PER CURIAM:

¶5This case presents just one issue: whether benefits paid plaintiff-appellant John E. Beesmer under New York State’s Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law are benefits “under a workmen's compensation law or plan of ... a State” within the meaning of the applicable offset provision of the Social Security Act in effect in 1975 when Beesmer became disabled, Pub.L. No. 89-97, § 335, 79 Stat. 286, 406 (1965) (amended 1981). The district court answered this question in the affirmative. The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Ralph W. Smith, Jr., dated December 12, 1984, and the Order of Judge Neal P. McCurn, dated February 9, 1984.

/744/f2d/10 · .json · Public domain