United States v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 1124 · 1984
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably United States v. Sherlock (1989), United States v. Harrelson (1985)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Florida v. Royer · United States v. California · United States v. Berkowitz · United States v. Sheikh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the essence or core of the defenses must be in conflict such that the jury, in order to believe the core of one defense, must necessarily disbelieve the core of the other.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that he received an unfair trial and suffered compelling prejudice against which the trial court was unable to afford protection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine whether [the defendant] yet suffered compelling prejudice as a result of the failure to sever.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Qualley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.