Martin v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 1245 · 1984
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Fritz (1987), United States v. Morrow (1992)
55 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Cronic · Sumner v. Mata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This was constitutional error even without any showing of prejudice.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action 'might be considered sound trial strategy.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]eliberate trial tactics may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if they fall 'outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Glenn v. Sowders · State v. Mick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.