Bender v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 1424 · 1984
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission (1989), New Mexico ex rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land Management (2009)
31 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 30 U.S.C. § 226 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Catlin v. United States · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the danger of injustice by delaying appellate review outweighs the inconvenience and costs of piecemeal review.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]n the unique instance where the issue is not 'collateral' but justice may require immediate review, a balancing approach should be followed to make this jurisdictional decision.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'may well be foreclosed from again appealing the district court's determination at any later stage'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.