Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.2d 1452 - Lynch v. Baxley

Lynch v. Baxley’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.2d 1452 · 1984

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Church v. City of Huntsville (1994), Jones v. Blanas (2004)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

20019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Bell v. Wolfish · Baker v. Carr · Gault · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiffs must demonstrate a personal stake in the outcome in order to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues necessary for the proper resolution of constitutional questions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]ast wrongs do constitute evidence bearing on whether there is a real and immediate threat of repeated injury which could be averted by the issuing of an injunction”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]ndividual standing requirements must be met by anyone attempting to represent [her] own interest or those of a class.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.