Local International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen Helpers of America v. Brink's Inc D’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 283 · 1984
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2015
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Smith v. Evening News Assn. · Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America v. P Lockridge · Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the issues are before the NLRB does not preclude plaintiff from raising them concurrently in an arbitration proceeding”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“nothing in the agreements can be construed to cover”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under the collective bargaining agreement,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.