Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.2d 5 - United States v. Todaro

United States v. Todaro’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.2d 5 · 1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably United States v. Ebbers (2006), United States v. Pinto (1988)

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Holland v. United States · Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · Barefoot v. Estelle · Murzyn v. United States · Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the district court must find that the government, through its own overreaching, has forced the witness to invoke the Fifth Amendment or, that the government has engaged in discriminatory use of grants of immunity to gain a tactical advantage; second, the witness’ testimony must be material, exculpatory and not cumulative; and third, the defendant has no other source to obtain the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the government has engaged in discriminatory use of immunity to gain a tactical advantage or, through its own over-reaching, has forced the witness to invoke the fifth amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[t]rial judges should summarily reject claims for defense witness immunity whenever the witness for whom immunity is sought is an actual or potential target of prosecution'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.