Bettin v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 53 · 1984
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1359
Relies on Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc. · McSparran v. Weist · Nyhus v. Travel Management Corp. · Janzen v. Goos · Corabi v. Auto Racing, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although not the beneficiaries of the court actions, are interested persons entitled to have their appointments respected in determining diversity jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pallazola v. Rucker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.