United States v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.2d 546 · 1984
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Ross (1996), United States v. Bortnovsky (1989)
43 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 694B · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Coastal Steel Corp. v. Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc. · United States v. Maze · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder section 1001 a false statement may be material even though the agency did not rely on it and was not influenced by it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“noted in the final clause is the affirmative act of concealment necessary to establish the trick, scheme or device under Sec. 1001 3 Both parties suggest that to properly determine whether a statement or concealment is in a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal agency, we must focus on whether the falsity would have”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“United States v. Brack, 747 F.2d 1142 , 1147 (7th Cir.1984) (citing United States v. DiFonzo, 603 F.2d 1260 , 1266 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1018, 100 S.Ct. 672, 62 L.Ed.2d 648 (1980)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1193, 84 L.Ed.2d 339 (1985). The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.