Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.2d 637 - Terrell v. Poland

Terrell v. Poland’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.2d 637 · 1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2015

14 federal appellate ·

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goss v. Board of Education · Isaacs v. United States · Marx v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule is well settled in this circuit that for an objection to be timely it must be made at the earliest possible opportunity after the ground of objection becomes apparent, or it will be considered waived.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.