Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.2d 653 - Tyler v. Harper

Tyler v. Harper’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.2d 653 · 1984

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Bliss (1987), Malady v. Crunk (1990)

11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1701984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he issue in the present case [is] identical to the issue decided in the prior adjudication; (2) [T]he prior adjudication resulted] in judgment on the merits; (3) [T]he party against whom collateral es-toppel is asserted is the same party (or in privity with a party) in the prior adjudication; and (4) [T]he party against whom collateral es-toppel is asserted ha[d] a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior suit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “at least 10 days before the time fixed for a hearing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.