Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “have determined that they should not defer to the NLRB's 3UPREME COURT OF NEVADA )1 1947A clew 19 decision in D.R. Horton on the ground that it conflicts with the explicit pronouncements of the Supreme Court concerning the policies undergirding the Federal Arbitration Act”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Bekele v. Lyft, Inc. · TALLMAN VS. DIST. CT. (CPS SECURITY (USA), INC.)

2. “[Plaintiff] Ms. Richards was a 'part[y] to an agreement making arbitration of disputes mandatory,' and therefore '[a]ny extra expense incurred as a result of [Ms. Richards's] deliberate choice of an improper forum, in contravention of their contract, cannot be charged to' [defendant].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hebei Hengbo New Materials Tech. Co. v. Apple, Inc.

3. “'general rule' against entertaining arguments on appeal that were not presented or developed before the district court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Depot, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc.