Castagna v. Luceno’s Empirical Analysis
744 F.3d 254 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly · Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. · City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. MBIA, Inc. · Arnold v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a matter of federal law[,] filing an EEOC charge does not toll the time for filing state tort claims, including those that arise out of the same nucleus of facts alleged in the charge of discrimination filed with the EEOC”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the time for filing [a state-law claim] is not tolled by the filing of a discrimination charge with the EEOC.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Commc'ns, Inc. , 957 F.2d 317 , 323 (7th Cir. 1992) (stating that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.