Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.3d 565 - Williams v. King

Williams v. King’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.3d 565 · 2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 524

Relies on Waugh v. Eldridge · In Re: Farmland Industries, Inc · Zahn v. Fink · Windle Agristor Credit Corporation v. Windle · Griffin v. City of Omaha

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The bankruptcy court was perfectly within its discretion to impose the sanction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.