Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 F.3d 571 - Bergstrom v. Frascone

Bergstrom v. Frascone’s Empirical Analysis

744 F.3d 571 · 2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Shelton v. American Motors Corp. · Fox v. Studebaker-Worthington, Inc. · Deborah Schoffstall v. William Henderson Agent

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although we typically review the imposition of discovery sanctions for abuse of discretion, such discretion narrows as the severity of the sanction or remedy the district court elects increases. The sanction of dismissal is among the harshest of sanctions, and there is a strong policy favoring a trial on the merits and against depriving a party of his day in court. Accordingly ... we more closely scrutinize dismissal imposed as a discovery sanction because the opportunity to be heard is a litigant's most precious right and should sparingly be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.