744 F. Supp. 2d 1159 - Matthews v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Haines v. Kerner · Farmer v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[rjelevant factors might include whether (1) the segregation relates to and furthers a legitimate penological interest, such as safety or rehabilitation; (2) the conditions of placement are extreme; (3) the placement increases the duration of confinement, as it did in Wilkinson-, and (4) the placement is indeterminate (in Wilkinson the placement was reviewed only annually).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rezaq v. Nalley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.