Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 P2D 196 - Payne v. State

Payne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States · Namet v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the surrounding circumstances in each case, focusing primarily on two factors, each of which suggests a distinct ground of error. First ... error may be based upon a concept of prosecutorial misconduct, when the Government makes a conscious and flagrant attempt to build its case out of inferences arising from use of the testimonial privilege_ A second theory seems to rest upon the conclusion that, in the circumstances of a given case, inferences from a witness’ refusal to answer added critical weight to the prosecution’s case in a form not subject to cross-examination, and thus unfairly prejudiced the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.