Canning v. Canning’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. Jones · 5 Utah 2d 79 - Wilson v. Wilson · English v. English · Woodward v. Woodward · MacDonald v. MacDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While equality is a worthy goal, precise mathematical equality is not essential or required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sorensen v. Sorensen“See generally Berger v. Berger, 713 P.2d 695 (Utah 1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sorensen v. Sorensen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.