Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 P2D 934 - Moore v. Hayes

Moore v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2016

9 state decisions

601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calhoun v. the MacCabees · Snethen v. OKL. UN. OF FARMERS EDUCATIONAL & CO-OP. UN. · State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Ekberg · Suglove v. Oklahoma Tax Commission · Burke v. Burke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Legislative enactments must be interpreted so as to render every word and sentence operative, rather than in a manner which would render a specific provision nugatory.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.