Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 SO2D 1042 - Johnson v. Moore

Johnson v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · 574 So. 2d 63 - Mills v. Dugger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Because the Anders procedure gave [appellant] the opportunity to make any argument that he believed his attorney should have raised, he cannot now seek relief by alleging ineffective assistance. Such allegations cannot be used to obtain additional appeals of issues that could have been raised on direct appeal."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.