Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 So. 2d 108 - State v. Bryant

744 So. 2d 108 - State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 505 So. 2d 714 - State v. Brooks · State v. Wilson · 464 So. 2d 293 - State v. Raheem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime. State v. Wilson, 467 So.2d 503 (La.1985); cert. denied, Wilson v. Louisiana 474 U.S. 911 , 106 S.Ct. 281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); State v. Blue, 97-2699 (La.App. 4th Cir.1/7/98), 705 So.2d 1242 , writ denied, 98-0340 (La.3/27/98), 716 So.2d 887 . Whether an informant’s tip establishes probable cause to arrest or reasonable suspicion to stop must be considered under the totality |sof the circumstances. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). Corroboration of details of an informant’s tip by an independent police investigation is valuable when applying the totality of the circumstances analysis. State v. Raheem, 464 So.2d 293 (La.1985). Although the reliability of the informant here was not established at the motion to suppress hearing, corroboration of the informant’s tip was made by the officers. Officer Schnapp testified that his partner, Officer Lampart, observed the defendant conduct what appeared to be a drug transaction prior to the defendant’s arrest and seizure of the black bag from the vehicle. The defendant argues, however, that the independent police investigation was insufficient to establish probable cause because there was no testimony indicating that the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.