744 So. 2d 1268 - Hershkowitz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · 629 So. 2d 841 - Brown v. State · 698 So. 2d 533 - State v. Mark Marks, PA · Florida High School Activities Ass'n v. Thomas ex rel. Thomas · 374 So. 2d 461 - NORTH RIDGE GEN. HOSPITAL, INC. v. City of Oakland Park
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is unlawful for any person ... to solicit any business ... for the purpose of making motor vehicle tort claims or claims for personal injury protection benefits required by s. 627.736. Any person who violates the provisions of this subsection commits a felony of the third degree....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradford“The burden is upon the party challenging the statute [the appellant in this case] to show that there is no conceivable factual basis which would rationally support such classification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under the rational basis test, the court must inquire `only whether it is conceivable that the ... classification bears some rational relationship to a legitimate state purpose.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rice v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.