Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 SO2D 181 - State v. Trepagnier

State v. Trepagnier’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

95 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Holloway v. Arkansas · State v. Dorthey · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · McKay v. Jobin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose. * * * * C. An attempt is a separate but lesser grade of the intended crime; and any person may be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime, although it appears on the trial that the crime intended or attempted was actually perpetrated by such person in pursuance of such attempt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`be exercised at a reasonable time, in a reasonable manner, and at an appropriate stage within the procedural framework of the criminal justice system.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “nothing more than the purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.