Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 So. 2d 192 - Medicus v. Scott

744 So. 2d 192 - Medicus v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 630 So. 2d 741 - Brown v. Drillers, Inc. · Ortego v. STATE, DOTD · 653 So. 2d 1152 - Guillory v. Interstate Gas Station · 508 So. 2d 1356 - Rivett v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. · 665 So. 2d 634 - Joyner v. Wear

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as otherwise provided by law, a valid and final judgment is conclusive between the same parties, except on appeal or other direct review, to the following extent: (1) If the judgment is in favor of the plaintiff, all causes of action existing at the time of final judgment arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation are extinguished and merged in the judgment. (2) If the judgment is in favor of the defendant, all causes of action existing at the time of final judgment arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation are extinguished and the judgment bars a subsequent action on those causes of action. (3) A judgment in favor of either the plaintiff or the defendant is conclusive, in any subsequent action between them, with respect to any issue actually litigated and determined if its determination was essential to that judgment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[p]ublic policy favors compromises and the finality of settlements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.