744 So. 2d 202 - Hammett v. Knight’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp. · Dixon v. Hughes · 612 So. 2d 107 - Autin v. Terrebonne · Pattan v. Fields · 709 So. 2d 269 - Herpin v. Boudreaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Change in domicile for purposes of qualifying for public office occurs when there is a change in actual residence accompanied by the intention to make the new residence the candidate's new establishment or home. Pattan v. Fields, 95 1936 (La.App. 1 Cir.1995); 669 So.2d 1233 [sic] ... Absent declaration to change domicile, proof of this intention depends upon circumstances; there is a presumption against change of domicile. Herpin v. Boudreaux, 98-306 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/5/98) , 709 So.2d 269 , writ denied, 98-0578 (La.3/11/98), 712 So.2d 859 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A person who meets the qualifications for the office he seeks may become a candidate and be voted on in a primary or general election if he qualifies as a candidate in the election. Except as otherwise provided by law, a candidate shall possess the qualifications for the office he seeks at the time he qualifies for that office. [emphasis added]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.