Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 744 So. 2d 306 - Taylor v. State

744 So. 2d 306 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Wheat v. United States · Morris v. Slappy · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 454 So. 2d 445 - Billiot v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will not disturb a jury's finding on conflicting testimony where there is substantial evidence to support the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not our function to determine whose testimony to believe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.