744 So. 2d 34 - Bozeman v. Mack’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 933 - Title Research Corp. v. Rausch · State v. Cripps · 387 So. 2d 1151 - Mullins v. State · 664 So. 2d 122 - Elliott v. District Attorney of Baton Rouge · Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If any- public record applied for by any authorized person is not in the custody or control of the person to whom the application is made, such person shall promptly certify this in writing to the applicant, and shall in the certificate state in detail to the best of his knowledge and belief, the reason for the absence of the record from his custody or control, its location, what person then has custody of the record and the manner and method in which, and the exact time at which it was taken from his custody or control. He shall include in the certificate ample and detailed answers to inquiries of the applicant which may facilitate the exercise of the right granted by this Chapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.