Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

744 So. 2d 582

Docket No. 98-03733.

Fisher v. Ackerman

Leigh M. FISHER, P.A., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Gary D. ACKERMAN and Betty Ackerman; Rodney D. Flynn, P.A., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1999.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-11-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2002

2 state decisions

Relies on 474 So. 2d 212 - Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*583 Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

¶2Thomas W. Franchino of Thomas W. Franchino, P.A., Naples, for Appellees/Cross-Appellants Ackerman.

¶3No appearance for remaining parties.

¶4THREADGILL, Judge.

¶5Leigh M. Fisher, P.A., defendant in an action for legal malpractice, appeals a final judgment entered against it after jury trial. The Ackermans, plaintiffs in that action, cross appeal based on the trial court's failure to award prejudgment interest in the final judgment. We affirm the final judgment in all respects except one. Because the verdict in this case liquidated damages as of a date certain, the Ackermans were entitled to an award of prejudgment interest. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.,474 So.2d 212 (Fla. 1985). We therefore remand to the trial court for entry of an award of prejudgment interest.

¶6Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.

¶7CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

/744/so2d/582 · .json · Public domain