744 So. 2d 586 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Payton v. New York · 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 351 So. 2d 716 - Hornblower v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We first disagree with the circuit court's conclusion that Davis was not detained. Davis's counsel presented extensive argument concerning whether Detective Eastmond had `asked' Davis to leave her home, or `instructed,' her to do so. This semantic distinction is irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Findley v. State“there has been an unequivocal break in the chain of illegality sufficient to dissipate the taint of the prior illegal police action and thus render the consent freely and voluntarily given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Findley v. State“a reasonable person, under similar circumstances, would believe he had to comply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Findley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.